From: Tijs van Bakel (smoke@wanadoo.nl)
Date: Thu 09 Aug 2001 - 01:21:04 IDT
Gregory Huczynski <greg@dcs.gla.ac.uk> writes:
> On a theoretical level, I thought that the second version would be faster, as
> I'm writing directly to video memory and only change one pointer to update a
> frame; in contrast, in the first version, I have to do a memory copy to update
> a frame. Any ideas why double buffering in video memory is actually
> slower?
Do you use the same video modes? Could you post the code somewhere,
or put it online?
--
Tijs van Bakel, <smoke@wanadoo.nl>
------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: To: listbot@svgalib.org
Body: unsubscribe linux-svgalib
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed 21 Jan 2004 - 22:10:24 IST